Captain America

⭐⭐⭐⭐ ½ averaged across 2 films.

tl;dr: A surprisingly solid introduction developed into the cornerstone franchise for driving the MCU forward.

Collections

Marvel Cinematic Universe Marvel

Captain America: The Winter Soldier

Spoilers Ahead: My reviews are not spoiler-free. You have been warned.

Considering that The Winter Soldier is one of my all-time favourite Marvel movies I'm a little baffled that I've never reviewed it before, but here we go: it's brilliant. Honestly, Phase Two was a mediocre period in general for the MCU, but it had some real peaks. Iron Man 3, Age of Ultron, and Thor: The Dark World are all fairly meh compared to their respective series, but Winter Soldier knocked it right out of the park and – more importantly – proved that Marvel movies could break free of the superhero mould.

Instead, we were given a proper spy movie, something that would hold up if you splashed James Bond or Mission: Impossible on the front cover instead of Captain America. Yes, the ultimate plot thread is extremely Marvel: Hydra, helicarriers, time-travelling retcons of beloved characters, and ridiculous hero team-up action sequences. But it's the journey of how you get to the big finale that sets Winter Soldier apart. It's tight, it's tense, and it doesn't pull its punches. It has twists and turns and a whole lot of excellent, practical fighting choreography.

Right from the initial sequence where Cap goes full stealth-mode, you know this is going in a different direction. That's a hugely enjoyable evolution of his character and really cements how much he has grown since we last saw him. Plus, the whole set-piece is beautifully filmed and perfectly paced. From there, we get a genuine insight into S.H.I.E.L.D, specifically how it now copes existing in a world of gods and monsters.That we get more Fury, Hill, and Romanov as a result is just the icing on the cake, particularly as we see these characters crumble and have the rug swept out beneath them. The car chase with Fury is one of the best I've seen in a long time, the elevator fight is iconic, and there are just so many fun beats as Bucky gets reintroduced and we begin to build up Falcon as a character.

Most importantly, particularly for a Marvel movie, the villain here feels real, well thought through, and consistent. Hydra are a great concept and I love that we get to see some of the more extreme ideas, like Zola being a digitised computer in the heart of the original S.H.I.E.L.D HQ. There are loads of neat nods back to both the first Captain America film and the future revelations that we learn of in films to come; everything just fits together so neatly.

Of course, you can't talk Winter Soldier or S.H.I.E.L.D without mentioning the spinoffs, but for once in the MCU it feels somehow right that they aren't directly involved. Obviously over on Agents the tie-in with Winter Soldier was a huge, defining moment for the show and just jumpstarted its success from fun mediocrity to greatness, but we also get some nice nods to Agent Carter without it ever feeling like these side projects are being ignored. It was a brilliant moment of multi-threaded storytelling and a huge success that should always be remembered as part of the legacy of this movie.

In other words, Winter Soldier remains one of the best Marvel movies made to date and continues to be a fun, well-crafted entry that brought something a little more to the MCU.

Captain America: Civil War

Spoilers Ahead: My reviews are not spoiler-free. You have been warned.

If you enjoy superhero films, actions films or just well-made genre films, then I have three words for you: watch. This. Now! It looks like Captain America has just pulled off the holy grail of trilogies, what I like to call a Star Wars arc. The First Avenger was a largely overlooked yet surprisingly solid introduction to the main characters, with some flaws but a consistent and well-formed core that made it an enjoyable watch that has aged surprisingly well. As a sequel The Winter Soldier is a clear Empire Strikes Back analogue, raising the stakes consistently, advancing plot narratives and being centred around a large plot twist that kept the action feeling fresh whilst maintaining a break-neck pace. Plenty of other franchises have pulled off this one-two punch, but frequently it is the closer that fails to land (I'm looking at you, Nolanverse Batman!).

Not so with Civil War. It's definitely a little slower than Winter Soldier, with a storyline which can struggle to breathe amidst the required action sequences. As a result, it doesn't quite hit the formers heady heights, but much like Return of the Jedi this third outing ties together the core storylines, fleshes out the universe, and allows for significant character development across the board. If you hadn't noticed by now, I'm definitely a fan.

There's actually not much for me to nit-pick. I felt the new characters were introduced well, with just enough screen time and interaction to make their presence feel warranted, rather than pandering to the fans or setting up spin-offs (even though that is certainly the core reasoning behind their inclusion). At the same time, the film had specific roles and ideas it clearly wanted to play out with the returning cast, making sure each hero had a moment to shine. I'd say Civil War did what Age of Ultron ultimately failed to do: produce a film with a huge supporting cast, yet succeeded in feeling both manageable and tight whilst finding time to advance each characters plotline in a meaningful way. Hawkeye definitely came out of the film with the least "impact", yet still managed to feel necessary. Furthermore, not only did each hero feel like they were needed to make the film work, they each felt realistic in the sides and decisions they chose.

Unlike the comic series on which the film was based, Tony Stark felt like a logical fit for the main antagonist. Rather than sliding into clear villainy, like the comic interpretation, the movie Stark maintained the strong sense of self that Robert Downey Jr has so cleverly crafted for him, with his actions following logical trains of thought for the character to be having. It makes sense that a visual, human reminder of his failings to end suffering and reduce the human cost of conflict – Stark's main driving factor since the Phase One films – would tip him over the edge and cause him to side wholeheartedly with the Accords. Similarly, Vision and War Machine have always been straight shooters, who expect everyone to be reading from the same playbook. Widow is a more tangential ally but, as she explains, siding with the government will be in her best interest, which is a very Widow thought process. On the flip side, the story very cleverly turns Wanda against her fellow Avengers, with Falcon sticking with his friend as would be expected and Antman just happy to be included (and no stranger to breaking the law).

If anything, Steve Rogers himself may be the sole character whose choices felt a little odd: though the Accords are clearly set up as something that shouldn't be trusted, they actually don't seem to do a great deal. Unlike the Superhero Registration Act, the Accords really don't do anything more than formalise a setup that has been informally maintained until this point. The Avengers were brought together by a government agency, S.H.E.I.L.D, specifically for use by that agency; Cap himself then goes off and works for them, thinking nothing of obeying official orders throughout Winter Soldier (though clear divisions are seeded as well). Stark has long provided military weaponry and tech, even after his change of heart when becoming Iron Man, as can clearly be seen by the fact that War Machine is still operational – not to mention the whole Extremis suit "army" that the US military seemingly had access to throughout Age of Ultron. My point being that Rogers hasn't seemed to have any issue with following governmental orders in the past, even those he didn't fully agree with under Nick Fury. As a result, his instant refusal to sign the Accords feels a little lacking in conviction. In this sense, Hawkeye's minimal role may actually be an incredibly clever one. The archer has the most to lose at the start of the film, being the only hero with an actual family/life outside of crime fighting (especially as Ms Potts has gone AWOL), yet he doesn't hesitate in joining Cap and company rallying against the Accords. That's a surprisingly big deal, as Hawkeye is the one that has gone from government agent to superhero; he's really the only character here who fully understands both sides (Widow also has this angle, but even as a S.H.I.E.L.D agent her spying background would have cast her as an outsider). As a result, because he falls where he does, it really lends credence to the idea that there is something off about the Accords and that Captain America has taken the correct stance.

Whichever way you cut it, though, the film stands up. It advances plot threads cleverly, introduces new characters and locations perfectly (I am so excited for Wakanda right now!) and tells the core story succinctly and clearly. Having now seen a couple of interviews with the Russo brothers discussing that Civil War was very much a trial for how they want to weave characters/plotlines together during the MCU's grand finale, Infinity Crisis, I have to say I'm both impressed and excited. So I guess the next big question is: how exactly is magic going to fit into everything else, Dr Strange?

Rewatch

Definitely a more worthy successor to the first Avengers film than Age of Ultron was, or alternatively a solid close to that trilogy. The introduction of both Spider-Man and Black Panther is excellent, serving to boost my interest in both stand-alone films significantly again (with not too long to wait now, either). More developed characters are treated more varyingly, with some pretty large plot holes.

I said a similar thing the first time around, but there just isn't enough justification given for why Captain America won't sign the accords. In the comics, you're talking about creating a list of anyone with powers, regardless of whether they are vigilantes/heroes, which is a huge privacy invasion and civil rights issue. The film version is specific to the Avengers themselves and never directly targets others, even though two more powered individuals are introduced during the film and we know there are dozens more thanks to the extended universe. Basically, I think they could have made the dispute a whole lot more interesting. Why not play off Parker existing, a kid just trying to do the right thing; they couldn't replicate his role in the comic but they could have come a lot closer. Or play off T'Challa, whose diplomatic immunity likely prevents him from having to sign the accords and making it a story about privilege. There are a lot of ways that they could have made the dispute a lot cleaner and more in-character.

Plus, that could have made the villain a little less redundant. I'm torn over Zemo's part in the plot, as it serves nicely to throw Bucky back into the mix and the revelation over Stark's parents is a clever one. That said, he still feels largely redundant to the plot and his 'evil plan' is completely bizarre. Why go to Siberia just to kill the other Winter Soldiers? Why bring the clip of Stark's parents with you? The whole plan fails if, say, Vision is the one that goes instead of Stark... it just feels a little dumb.

Still, despite all of that, the action is incredible, the casting remains spot on and the dialogue well balanced. The film has a lot of unexplored potential but it is still a huge amount of fun and one I will definitely revisit multiple times in the future.

Rewatch

I don't know, I'm starting to think that my elevated opinion of so many Marvel movies at the moment may just be a reaction to lockdown-blues or a general lack of outside input, but I really enjoyed Civil War. I never thought it was a bad movie, but re-reading my old reviews I definitely had a bigger issue with parts of the plot. Take the whole "Cap folds too quickly"; sure, that's a legitimate response and I stand by my earlier reasoning that it could have been done better and with greater interest, but I was totally fine with the explanations given. It feels more like Cap is weighing things up than is just flat opposed to the Accords this time around, and it isn't until Peggy's funeral and then the way that they go after Bucky that he becomes resolved to go alone. In some ways, given everything that has happened in Winter Soldier with S.H.I.E.L.D, and then again in Age of Ultron with the Avengers themselves, I'm not so surprised that he wants to stay independent. Still, I do wish that they'd used the Spider-Man angle or the immunity angle with Black Panther.

Also, with what we now know about Nat's personal arc, her desire to keep the Avengers together suddenly feels a lot more logical. She fights the entire film to try and retain her family, and that's kinda interesting to see given what happens in End Game.

That said, the fight sequence in the airport means I don't care. I don't care that Zemo feels a little aimless (though I actually really enjoyed him from an acting perspective this time around); I don't care that the initial setup with Wanda's explosion feels a little weird; I don't care about the bizarre plot twist killing of the other soldiers. The moment that Antman becomes Giant-Man for the first time and grabs War Machine is worth all of it 🐜